Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning and University Student Views on Juvenile Justice (2nd author with Joe Murray, and Don Adams)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Male and female students' views on juvenile justice were compared within the context of a broader discussion of moral reasoning in public life. Opposition to adult prosecution of juveniles was found to be stronger among women than among men, as predicted under the theoretical framework set forth by Gilligan (1982). The results of the study underscore the social significance of female students' participation in judicial, service-learning, and leadership activities in college.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of College and Character
StatePublished - Feb 2001

Disciplines

  • Education

Cite this